What do you think? Use the Reply button to make your voice heard.
Rate the quality of this review
And the results are...
66.7%
2Excellent
33.3%
1Good
0%
0Decent
0%
0Lacking
0%
0Poor
Sign in to vote!
by TomFri, 5 Sep 2008, 10:36pm
Facebook launched onto the scene as a new and exciting way to connect with your friends and meet others at your University.  Each college had their own subdomain and lots of care was taken to add in information about universities to help standardize profiles.  Over time, more useful features were added to the site and it continued to grow.  Then Facebook decided to also create communities for high schoolers.  A natural extension to be sure, and they assured their users that there would not be any overlap between the two networks.

That, of course, changed.  Facebook went on to support regions and companies and has since moved on to combine all of these into one giant network and removed many of the features (e.g. course listings) that made the original site a success.  They continued to innovate with great features such as "Beacon" and the "Mini-Feed" which altered the site in ways that many of the early users were displeased with.

The "New Facebook" is the next iteration of bad design, which makes information harder to find and turns everything into a giant feed.  The original value of Facebook, the simple ability to communicate and share with friends is hidden away amidst what a user rented from Blockbuster last week (or the like).

Of course, Facebook knows their product was finished a long time ago.  They just weren't interested in that product.  Each change either serves to bring in new users at the expense of existing ones or increase revenues at the expense of all users.  (This makes sense--what do they care if 1,000 people quit in disgust when they broke their promise about keeping the networks separate if they gain 10,000 more as a result?  Or if they lose 1,000 people but gain an additional $1/year on the remaining 10,000?*)

Facebook should be applauded as a wildly successful business built from the ground up by exploiting college students across the country.  Smartly done!

(Now, does anyone want to build a social networking site where college students can connect with their friends and meet others at their Universities?  It'd probably be a success!)

*These numbers are all too small and are for illustrative purposes only.
Help keep Illinois flat--don't litter!
by maiabee8Sun, 7 Sep 2008, 8:42pm
I agree!
Hell - like Candy Land except less delicious.
by beckyzooleMon, 8 Sep 2008, 7:21pm
I liked Facebook a lot better when it was simpler -- I could log on, write on a wall, throw a cow at someone, and be done with it. But now it takes half an hour just to slog through all the announcements, requests, notifications... It just doesn't seem worth the time.

On the other hand, it still is a good way to keep in touch, share photos, and play word games long-distance.
106 miles to Chicago, full tank o'gas, half pack o'cigarettes, it's dark, & we're wearing sunglasses
by AndrewFri, 3 Oct 2008, 2:16pm
This is exactly right. 

I also don't like the fact that it proliferates the distribution of low-resolution photos.  Most people don't realize how much quality they are loosing when their 6 megapixel photo is reduced to 640x480.  Hopefully they keep the originals...
"Well, my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle."
-
by TomFri, 3 Oct 2008, 2:32pm
Oy, I know!  I'm not surprised that FB limits the size of them, though.  Their bandwidth bills would be astronomical.  (I mean, we have size limits on images here at ITOG, too!)  Yeah... I do miss the days before Facebook when trading photos with friends meant bringing over a CD and copying the originals instead of saying "oh hey, look at this".  I s'pose we just need to convince more people to use Flickr.
Help keep Illinois flat--don't litter!
Sign In
Get your free ITOG account!
Loading...